Jul 092012
 

City government is inherently intimate. Our local representatives are not thousands of miles away in the Capital; they are our friends, neighbors, and peers. While this closeness is an asset, making city council more understanding of the people and their needs, it also gives rise to a fundamental issue–whenrepresentatives are expected to be actively involved citizens of the community, conflicts of interest are bound to be common. Indeed, this issue has been raised in each city council meeting that I have attended, most recently the one which took place on July 2nd. At the heart of this discussion lies one core question: what constitutes a conflict of interest in city government?

It is inevitable that city council members will be involved in a variety of local issues, so is it truly reasonable to expect them to recuse themselves from every item in which they have any interest? It is, in my opinion, absurd to call a conflict of interest as any connection to the item at hand. At this lowest level of government, this definition will force city council members to recuse themselves at every meeting. The only way to avoid such a problem is to impose strict limits on that which constitutes a conflict of interest. After all, having a connection to an issue does not always mean that a person is unable to judge upon it fairly. This ability is only compromised when the person standsĀ  to gain or to lose something by the decision, yet even this is not completely true. The members of the city council are upstanding, honorable individuals who, I believe, would not succumb to their personal interests unless they were going to suffer or profit greatly. They ought to be trusted with the responsibility of deciding for themselves whether or not a personal interest will disable them from doing their job. Because city government is so close to the community, conflicts of interest arise with a rather inconvenient frequency. In order to allow city council member to do the job they were elected to do and not constantly be required to recuse themselves, these conflicts must only be taken into account when the person affected by it deems it to be of importance, or when others clearly believe that it impairs their judgement due to extreme personal involvement. Otherwise, a mere connection or other conflict of interest need not cause worry.

 

  •  Posted by on July 9, 2012 at 4:12 pm
  •   Comments Off on How close is too close?

Zak Kayal

For the first thirteen years of my life, I lived in and around Philadelphia. After moving to Greenwood Village in 2008, I began attending Campus Middle School. I am currently a junior at Cherry Creek High School, where I am involved in the Youth Advisory Board, French Honor Society, Gay-Straight Alliance, and Harry Potter Club. I have always been fascinated by government and the ways it affects and interacts with ordinary citizens. This led me to participate in the 2012 National Peace Essay Contest for the United States Institute of Peace and won for the state of Colorado. In college, I hope to major in political science or linguistics.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.