Dec 162011
 

Today’s meeting was particularly intriguing because a elementary topic was introduced, a businessman looking to get a liquor license. This was the first meeting we attended in which the time allotted to public comment was used. The business owner, Marmel Corporation is trying to open a liquor shop that specializes in the distribution of middle eastern liquor in Arapahoe Road area. The reason this is up for discussion is because there are four other shops within a one mile radius of this location that also supply people with liquor. The entrepreneur claims that this area is the perfect place for his shop because of the high exposure, since the area is adjacent to a busy highway. The only problem with this is that the other business owners in the area do not want another shop opening so close to them because it might redirect customers away from their shops. With that being said, those business owners are fighting to disallow Marmel Corporation’s request for a liquor license.

I think that this issue is interesting because these business owners, who had to apply for a liquor license are fighting Marmel Corporation’s request. Another thing that should be noted about this issue is that the United States operates with a market economy. A substantial part of a market economy is competition. Competition is great for many reasons. Competition allows us to have the lowest prices, it allows companies to work harder to give us the best products they can and  it promotes a higher standard of living. These business owners had to apply for a liquor license too, what if the current business owners tried to disallow them the right to get their license? Marmel Corporation is where they were whenever they started their business. I think the Council made the right choice by allowing the business owner to have the license. I think the Council made the correct decision by allowing Marmel Corporation to have their liquor license.

  •  Posted by on December 16, 2011 at 9:25 am
  •   Comments Off on Liquor License Altercation
Dec 142011
 

As a democratic city, we allow citizens to voice their opinions. Last week, two public hearings took place. The first was a request for a liquor license in the area west of I-25 on Arapahoe road. Proponents for the case argued that their was a desire for a business engaged in selling spirits at the proposed location and that the site would specialize in Middle Eastern spirits which other area liquor store lacked. Against the case were other liquor store owners located within a mile radius of the proposed location. They argued that there was no demand for another store and that their was an “undue concentration of  liquor establishments in the area.”

The lawyer representing the argument against the business, pointed out holes in the case of the proponents. The chambers felt like a court room as the lawyers cross-examined the witnesses. It was brought to the attention of the Council that one of the witnesses lived outside of the one-mile radius which witnesses had to live within.

This is perhaps the most interesting issue that I have witnessed as an intern. When deciding how I would vote, I had to separate my sympathy for the other business owners from that of the principles of government unjustly interfering with competition among retail establishments. To me, the key fact that was presented was the affidavit of the Police Department that stated that the establishment would not require additional patrols to maintain security. With this in mind, I agree with the unanimous council, and would have voted to pass the ordinance.

  •  Posted by on December 14, 2011 at 6:03 pm
  •   Comments Off on Chaos- Council Meeting 12/5/11